It is done

It looks like both houses of Congress have agreed to the 1,000+ page, $787,000,000,000 "stimulus" package that is going to save our country from the abyss.

Before you accuse our elected officials of vigorously scratching the itch to spend our children's money, remember, it could have been worse:

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the stimulus package will cost $787 billion, rather than $789 billion lawmakers estimated earlier this week.

That is what passes as fiscal responsibility on Capitol Hill.

And this, from San Francisco's favorite carpetbagging daughter:

“The jobs the American people care about most -- their own -- will be dramatically safer the day that President Obama signs this plan into law,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat.

I know I feel much safer about my job after reading that. Please, somebody find me one sound-byte that falls out of her yapper that isn't plum-crazy talk.

This is interesting:

Lawmakers dropped provisions barring funds from going to museums, arts centers and theaters. A ban on money to casinos, golf courses, zoos and swimming pools was retained.

I like museums, arts centers and theaters as much as the next guy, which is why when I use them, I pay the price of admission which I assume is structured to cover the costs of doing business. Why they should get free money from the government; while casinos, golf courses, zoos and swimming pools(??) are all forced to survive in the capitalist--sorry--socialist wilderness on their own is beyond me. Well if this results in a reduction of the $25 price of admission to the shiny new California Academy of Sciences I suppose I will be forced to reconsider my stance on the entire "stimulus" bill.

Lawmakers deleted provisions requiring businesses receiving stimulus funding to use E-Verify, a government program used to ensure workers are in the country legally.

By all means, we must not upset the largest potential block of new democratic voters, at least not until after the 2010 census. If Obama successfully wrestles control of the census count away from the Dept. of Commerce and into the White House--which is illegal if the US Constitution is your guiding principle anyhow--illegal aliens will be a permanent fixture of the democratic machine.

Most senators had left the chamber’s floor hours before the final tally was announced. The vote was held open for five hours until Senator Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat, returned from his home state to cast the deciding vote for the bill. Brown had been in Ohio following the death of his mother earlier this week.

Rest In Peace Mrs. Brown; government has yet to invent a way to tax you in the afterlife. And if you thought curious, inquiring congressional minds may want to stick around and read what they just signed , you'd be wrong:

“It is over a thousand pages,” said Representative Tom Price, a Georgia Republican. “It is physically impossible for any member to have read this bill.”

I've been reading the abridged version of the History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire for almost 3 years now. It comes in a little under 1,000 pages. It is taking me a long time to read because it is a lot to digest, and nobody is paying me to read it. Maybe I should just thumb through it and tell people I read it instead. At least I wouldn't let contemplating any of the details hold me back from taking a first-class trip to Europe.

On a more positive note, what we need are more economists like Michelle talking no-nonsense economics with Obama supporters, capturing it on video and broadcasting it on YouTube.


(h/t texas rainmaker via instapundit for the image at the top of the page. Probably photoshopped or a prank, but it does capture the spirit of the Obama rapture rather well.)

Too handsome to lampoon

Two hours and thirty five minutes into Obama's presidency, and already he's off limits to least one European cartoonist:

Obama too handsome for good satire -caricaturist

Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:35:00 AM (GMT-08:00) BRUSSELS, Jan 20 (Reuters) -

U.S. President Barack Obama is too good looking to provide inspiration for cartoons in the same way George W. Bush served as fodder for some of their most biting commentary, a caricaturist on said Tuesday.

"It's never a gift for a caricaturist to draw a handsome man," said Pierre Kroll, from Belgium, which prides itself on its comic book culture including Tintin.

"Somehow, we prefer overweight people, people with a beard, huge noses, ridiculous glasses ... If caricaturists could elect presidents, we would choose people with faces we enjoy drawing, and not a playboy like him," said Kroll whose works appears in the Belgian daily "Le Soir".

Kroll said positive public sentiment towards the incoming U.S president might also make it harder for caricaturists whose portraits have to underline a person's weaknesses and flaws.

"Caricaturists like to be a bit nasty and here, he comes with a lot of sympathy, it's harder for us to do our job and mock him while Bush had become a favourite target for cartoonists," he said.

(Reporting by Bate Felix and Marine Hass)

I feel sorry for poor Pierre Kroll. He is so blinded by Bush-hatred that he fails to see that Obama's ears are almost as big as Dumbo the Elephant's. If those suckers aren't perfect caricature-fodder I don't know what is. Then he goes on to describe what really makes a good caricature, "overweight people, people with a beard, huge noses, ridiculous glasses" without stopping to consider that Bush possessed none of those features, yet they had a field day with him. I hope he has another skill to fall back on, because caricatures of the former President Bush are going to start to look a little out dated pretty quickly. Maybe he makes a really bitchen' Belgian waffle!

The One We've Been Waiting For

Gotta love capitalism:





I wonder how long the seller would tolerate me if I went over to the flea market on Hayes and Octavia next Sunday and bought one, then accidentally dropped it, then bought another one, and "oops", dropped it again, etc...?

Where the rubber meets the pavement

Ever since environmentalism became a shibboleth of the left, and therefore the Democrats, I have wondered how they would react when the time came to reconcile their actions with their purported beliefs. It appears I will not have to wonder much beyond the DNC in Denver this summer:

Caterers find eco-standards tough to chew

Fried shrimp on a bed of jasmine rice and a side of mango salad, all served on a styrofoam plate. Bottled water to wash it all down.

These trendy catering treats are unlikely to appear on the menu at parties sponsored by the Denver 2008 Host Committee during the Democratic National Convention this summer.

Fried foods are forbidden at the committee's 22 or so events, as is liquid served in individual plastic containers. Plates must be reusable, like china, recyclable or compostable. The food should be local, organic or both.

How are we ever going to make the shift from fossil fuel to vegetable oil power if fried food is forbidden? That's a serious question I keep meaning to ask somebody with a "powered by vegetable oil" sticker proudly displayed on their bumper.

And caterers must provide foods in "at least three of the following five colors: red, green, yellow, blue/purple, and white," garnishes not included, according to a Request for Proposals, or RFP, distributed last week.

...All the pretty colors of the rainbow.
Reading this far I was reminded of the first Burning Man theme camp planning meeting I attended a few years ago. We had settled on a genie-type theme and purchased a used golf cart we intended to turn into an art car. One of my camp mates proposed turning the golf cart into an elaborate motorized genie bottle and she had done some nice sketches to show us what she had in mind. We all agreed that it looked great, then somebody asked her for a list of materials and a rough outline of the building plan so we could get started. Her confusion over the question turned to slight irritation when she realized that not only did she not have any specs, we weren't going to do it all for her. The vision quickly turned to dust.
I imagine the person who was tasked with creating the DNC catering RFP is similar to my idealistic camp mate that year.

The shrimp-and-mango ensemble? All it's got is white, brown and orange, so it may not have the nutritional balance that generally comes from a multihued menu.

"Blue could be a challenge," joked Ed Janos, owner of Cook's Fresh Market in Denver. "All I can think of are blueberries."

Ed nails it. Blueberries being the only exception that immediately springs to mind, every first year culinary student knows that putting blue on a plate is a cardinal sin.

Caterers praise the committee and the city for their green ambitions, but some say they're baffled by parts of the RFP.

"I think it's a great idea for our community and our environment. The question is, how practical is it?" asks Nick Agro, the owner of Whirled Peas Catering in Commerce City. "We all want to source locally, but we're in Colorado. The growing season is short. It's dry here. And I question the feasibility of that."

Agro's biggest worry is price. Using organic and local products hikes the costs.

"There is going to be sticker shock when those bids start coming in," he says. "I'll cook anything, but I've had clients who have approached me about all-organic menus, and then they see the organic stuff pretty much doubles your price."

Mr. Agro,

Please resist the urge to use words like "practical" and "feasibility", for they have no meaning in the eco-lexicon. Just make it happen, and if you're not prepared to put the good of our planet above your personal profits, we will find somebody that does.

Signed, DNC

P.S. we've noted your propensity to question authority, and we're not happy, but we'll address your insouciance after the convention.

The document, which applies only to the host committee's parties, came after months of work that involved discussions with caterers and event planners along the Front Range, says Parry Burnap, Denver's "greening" director.

Months of work filled by many, many hours spent in committee and sub-committee meetings to come up with the RFP. There's nothing bureaucracy loves more than more bureaucracy.

Thousands of other parties hosted by corporations, lobbying groups, individuals, nonprofits and more will happen in Denver during the convention, Burnap says. None of them is subject to the committee's green agenda.

The committee's effort to host eco-friendly events, she says, hinges on its determination not just to put on a smart convention but to transform Denver into a top-shelf green city.

What's a law without a gaping loophole afterall? I hope somebody keeps score of all the non-conforming parties that take place and who hosted them.

"We are hoping that everything we are doing for greening (the convention) has some legacy value," she says.

The RFP, for example, will likely live on after the convention in a brochure the city will distribute widely to help guide local businesses interested in improving their green practices.

It will have legacy value alright. My guess is that the DNC will host a small handful of perfectly "eco-friendly" parties and showcase them as the rule rather than the exception.

Burnap says taking the organic and local route may be more costly, but the committee thinks caterers will find ways to comply and still make a profit.

"It takes some creativity because some of these things are more expensive," she says. "But we're at the front end of a market shift."

One of two things will happen. The caterers will sacrifice a large percentage of their profit margin and "make it happen" for the "greater good" or they will cheat and charge organic prices for non-organic products. Most people are not able to tell when a filet mignon has been replaced with an "eye of round" which is a much cheaper cut of meat, for example. Who will be able to tell if the avocados used in the guacamole are organic or not? Catering is hard work fraught with unforeseen hassles and much pressure in order to put out a quality product that the clients are unlikely to even fully appreciate. I would be shocked if any caterer that was not independently wealthy would sacrifice any part of their already slim profit margin. Cheating would be far easier, especially when the theme is all a pose in the first place.

Joanne Katz, owner of Three Tomatoes Catering in Denver, cheers the committee's environmental aspirations and is eager to get involved with the convention, but she wonders if some of the choices the committee is making are really green.

Compostable products, such as forks and knives made from corn starch, are often imported from Asia, delivered to the U.S. in fuel-consuming ships. But some U.S. products are made from recyclable pressed paper. Which decision is more environmentally sound?

"Customers are beginning to demand these things, and we don't have all of the information," she says. "And we are doing the best we can, one project at a time."

Ms. Katz,

Your wondering is troubling. We will deal with you after the convention, too.

Signed, DNC

Burnap acknowledged that figuring out what is most green can be difficult.

"Maybe in 20 years, there will be better analysis for us to make better choices," she says. "One we are talking about now is, is it better to compost or to recycle? If you are using a cup for a beverage, is it better to be (plastic) and back in the materials stream, or compostable, biodegradable waste and go into the waste stream or compost? There are no definitive answers."

Composting for the convention hasn't been entirely figured out yet, she says.

What a wonderful nation we live in; where the greatest problem of the moment seems to be whether it is better to compost or to recycle? I wonder what a typhoon survivor in Burma, or an earthquake survivor in China, or a Darfur refugee, or, or, or--thinks is the biggest problem of the day?

The committee is working with other groups to develop a carbon-footprint "calculator" that will measure the environmental impact of each event and suggest an "offset" — a fee — that will go toward a fund helping to match carbon losses with carbon gains.

"That's a fun one," Burnap says. "If these event planners will calculate and offset, it will start to get the money flowing into the Colorado Carbon Fund, a fund that will reinvest in renewable energy here in Colorado."

Whoooopppieeeee! Boy I know nothing gets my motor revved quite like carbon-footprint calculations. Next up, a self-administered root canal sans novicane!

I hope they don't plan on encouraging people to walk around Denver during the convention, since it has been proven in the U.K. that walking kills the planet.

The only advice I can give to the caterers of Denver is to get all of your money up front, in cash.

From the 4th of July Archives

Though the piece is two years old now, James Lilek's thorough fisking of Michael Moore's editorial in the L.A. Times about the meaning of the 4th of July remains one of my favorites.

Enjoy the long weekend!

Quantifying Political Correctness

In a previous post I talked about how Larry Summers was being forced from his post as President of Harvard University by the faculty of the Arts & Sciences department for some "controversial" comments he made regarding innate gender differences and their possible correlation to the lack of women in the upper eschelons of science.

Last year, as part of a sentence handed down for insider trading in his own company's stock in 2001, Larry Ellison of Oracle was required to donate $100 million to the charity of his choice. He chose to donate $115 million to the Harvard University Global Health Initiative. One year later, the money has been slow to come, and no deal had yet been signed outside of his pledge. Now we know why:

Sources familiar with the deal claim Ellison delayed the project because of controversy embroiling economist and then-Harvard President Lawrence Summers.
The sources, who asked to remain anonymous because they feared losing their
jobs, said only Summers had the international clout needed to roll out such an
ambitious project, which involved tracking how health care dollars are spent and
what impact they have in the developed and developing worlds.
Summers resigned in February, amid faculty uproar over comments suggesting that differences in "intrinsic aptitude" may explain why fewer women than men succeed in math and science.

Mr. Ellison said he plans to give the money that would have gone to Harvard to a charity that trains teachers and educates impoverished children in the developing world. He didn't identify the institution or elaborate further.

I wonder how the Arts & Sciences Department feels about this?

Stop the World and Let Off All the Fools...

It's unfortunate that myths about Iraq continually need to be debunked, but when you are up against the Enemies Within who are unmoored from the Reality Bouy, have absolutely no shame and recognize no boundaries to the things they're willing to do to in order to bring others into their World of Delusion; it's necessary.

Thankless Pacifists

This morning I woke to the following headline: U.S., British Troops Rescue Iraq Hostages

BAGHDAD, Iraq - U.S. and British troops Thursday freed three Christian peace activists in a rural area of Iraq without firing a shot, ending a four-month hostage drama in which an American among the group was shot to death and dumped on a Baghdad street.

Maj. Gen. Rick Lynch, the U.S. military spokesman, said the hostages were being held by a "kidnapping cell" in a house, and the operation to free the captives was based on information from a man captured by U.S. forces only three hours earlier.
(Proof that when we torture poor sheep farmers with underpants and barking dogs they can yield useful information.)

As the article states, these were the comrades of the recently murdered American Tom Fox, all members of the Christian Peacemakers Team based in Chicago. From the heading on their website, "What would happen if Christians devoted the same discipline and self-sacrifice to nonviolent peacemaking that armies devote to war?" I gather that they are pacifists in practice and at heart.
Doug Pritchard, the group's co-director speaking from Toronto, had this to say about the rescue operation:

"They knew that their only protection was in the power of the love of God and of their Iraqi and international co-workers," Pritchard said.

He also called for coalition forces to leave the country.

"We believe that the illegal occupation of Iraq by Multinational Forces is the root cause of the insecurity which led to this kidnapping and so much pain and suffering in Iraq," Pritchard said.

Commentary

Pacifism is a fine strategy when the stakes are low. It's easy to make enlightened claims about the virtues of non-violence when the wolves are not knocking at the door. Probably the most famous pacifist of the 20th century was Mahatma Gandhi. He and his followers famously stood down the mighty British Empire, paving the way for an independent India. I can't help but wonder how India would have fared using such a strategy against Chairman Mao, Stalin, or Hitler rather than the largely benevolent British?
Gandhi had this to say regarding the Jews and the Holocaust: "The Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher's knife. They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs." He believed that the Jews should commit mass suicide in order to make the Third Reich introspectively realize that maybe the Aryan race was not really the master race afterall, and should instead live peacefully with their neighbors as equals. Regardless of whether or not you believe in reincarnation as Gandhi did, recommending mass suicide hardly seems like the recipe for living peacefully on this earth in this moment.

The lack of gratitude that Doug Pritchard and CPT have shown for the brave troops that rescued the hostages is inexcusable. Instead of for a moment setting aside his dogmatic belief "... that their only protection was in the power of the love of God and of their Iraqi and international co-workers" and thanking the actual people that rescued his helpless pacifists, he instead took the opportunity to call for the coalition forces to leave the country. Surely he would argue that they would have never been harmed had we never invaded Iraq etc... A chicken or the egg argument if there ever was one. It seems the power and the love of God was a little slow to the rescue. Fortunately for the CPT, our brave Armed Forces were up to the thankless task.
Pacifism is not only immoral, it's suicidal.

UPDATE:
In my recent post, "Weapons of Mass Destruction Revisited" I mentioned the boxes of documents and hours of audio tapes that we've found in Iraq leftover from Saddam's reign. Some enterprising members of Pajamas Media have taken to translating some of the documents themselves and then cross-checking the translations for accuracy. The following link provides evidence that members of Saddam's regime were in contact with Osama Bin Laden via Sudan as early as 1995.
Also, Mark Steyn has written an excellent article that explores the costs of maintaining the U.N. mandated sanctions against Iraq had we continued with the status quo.

Proof That People Have Too Much Free Time

And to think I wasted last weekend enjoying good company, fresh snow and abundant sunshine in the Sierras when I could have stuck around town and participated in this.

Suicide Thinkers

There exists in Western civilization a virus that infects a certain percentage of the population. This virus causes the victim to believe that the West is responsible for all that ills the world. They refuse to acknowledge the myraid discoveries and contributions to the World Body of Knowledge that have come from the West; and how our open culture of natural and scientific inquiry has fostered this. They see the world through the twin lenses of "white, male oppression" and "capitalistic greed" and measure all things against a standard nothing short of perfection. To them, all discussion (if they allow any at all) is framed in this manner. There are numerous examples to be found in the current events of today. Not suprisingly, many of these infected minds can be found among the faculties of high schools and colleges throughout the nation. Mostly, they seem to be clustered in humanity departments where political grievances have been turned into courses of study with names such as "world studies", "women's studies" and "(insert your favorite 'oppressed' minority here) studies." They also reside in such prestigious places like the Arts & Sciences Department at Harvard as we found out when they recently forced Larry Summers from his job as president for his "heretical" views.
The following link explores this phenomena and its orgins in the Soviet Cold War propaganda machine. The Islamofacist movement--that explicity threatens all that the West stands for--sees in these infected individuals a valuable ally.
Here are some of the symptoms:

There is no truth, only competing agendas.

All Western (and especially American) claims to moral superiority over
Communism/Fascism/Islam are vitiated by the West’s history of racism and colonialism.

There are no objective standards by which we may judge one culture to be better than another. Anyone who claims that there are such standards is an evil oppressor.

The prosperity of the West is built on ruthless exploitation of the Third World; therefore Westerners actually deserve to be impoverished and miserable.

Crime is the fault of society, not the individual criminal.

Poor criminals are entitled to what they take. Submitting to criminal predation is more virtuous than resisting it.

The poor are victims. Criminals are victims. And only victims are virtuous. Therefore only the poor and criminals are virtuous. (Rich people can borrow some virtue by identifying with poor people and criminals.)

For a virtuous person, violence and war are never justified. It is always better to be a victim than to fight, or even to defend oneself. But "oppressed" people are allowed to use violence anyway; they are merely reflecting the evil of their oppressors.

When confronted with terror, the only moral course for a Westerner is to apologize for past sins, understand the terrorist’s point of view, and make concessions.

These ideas travel under many labels: postmodernism, nihilism, multiculturalism, Third-World-ism, pacifism, "political correctness" to name just a few. It is time to recognize them for what they are, and call them by their right name: suicidalism.

I have to confess I do not know too much about the propaganda war that raged from the 1950's straight through to the fall of the Berlin Wall, but Department V did exist, and it's not a stretch of the imagination to believe that they are responsible for this suicide virus that infects the West today.

Antidote anybody?

Thought Police 1; Free Speech 0

Larry Summers, the president of Harvard, resigned today. I shouldn't really care too much about this since I have nothing to do with Dr. Summers, Harvard or higher education for that matter, but the circumstances that led to his resignation are what compel me to post on the subject.
In January of 2005 he gave a speech at a conference on diversfication of the science and engineering workforce. He discussed possible reasons for the current underrepresentation of women at the top in many fields, especially in science and engineering. He said that although his remarks were provocative, it was vitally important to study the underlying reasons. These may include social issues, such as willingness to commit fully to a highly demanding career, and biological differences between the genders.

Here's the part of the speech that was so controversial:
"So my best guess, to provoke you, of what's behind all of this is that the largest phenomenon, by far, is the general clash between people's legitimate family desires and employers' current desire for high power and high intensity, that in the special case of science and engineering, there are issues of intrinsic aptitude, and particularly of the variability of aptitude, and that those considerations are reinforced by what are in fact lesser factors involving socialization and continuing discrimination. I would like nothing better than to be proved wrong."

This was too much for poor, hyperventilating Nancy Hopkins to bear:
Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, walked out on Summers' talk, saying later that if she hadn't left, ''I would've either blacked out or thrown up." Five other participants reached by the Globe, including Denice D. Denton, chancellor designate of the University of California, Santa Cruz, also said they were deeply offended, while four other attendees said they were not.

Soon after there were demonstrations on campus demanding that he resign because of his "insensitive" and "sexist" remarks. After a month of the situation smoldering the School of Arts and Sciences gave Dr. Summers a vote of no confidence, an unprecedented step in the history of Harvard. Since then it is apparent they have been unrelenting in their pressure for him to step down. Today he finally capitulated and he had this to say:
"I have reluctantly concluded that the rifts between me and segments of the Arts and Sciences faculty make it infeasible for me to advance the agenda of renewal that I see as crucial to Harvard's future. I believe, therefore, that it is best for the University to have new leadership." (Read Summers's letter.)

Commentary

What I find so disturbing about this entire episode is that the president of what is arguably the most prestigious university in the United States should be forced to resign because he dared to suggest that there may be innate differences between men and women. In other words, he dared to stray from the liberal/PC dogma that the Arts and Sciences department preached and he paid for it with his job. He wanted to generate discussion and instead he got fully censured. I was under the impression that college--especially an Ivy League college--was a place where young malleable minds go to pick and choose from a garden of different, sometimes conflicting ideas and later assemble those carefully chosen ingredients together into what could be called their Philosophy of Life. In short--the university presents, the student decides. If a university president is forced to resign by the PC Thought Police, what does that say about the state of higher education in America in general?
I wish Harvard all the best in finding a new president. Hopefully they will find somebody who kow-tows to the Arts and Sciences department, realizes a university president should be seen and not heard, and above all doesn't court controversy by suggesting debate when trying to find answers to the problems that plague us today.

(I urge you to read the whole speech that got him in trouble in the first place and determine for yourself if his words are sexist.)

Karina Sensationalism

It doesn't take superior intellect to realize that when Mother Nature comes calling, fortune favors those who are prepared. What happened in New Orleans was a terrible tragedy and it resonates with me somewhat personally due to the fact that we visit the city every year during Jazzfest. The way it has been politicized is nothing short of disgusting. Local government blamed the state government blamed the Federal government blamed the local government and so on. Scoring cheap political points trumped tangible aid on the ground. Global warming experts such as Barbra Streisand placed the blame on our failure to sign the well intentioned yet ultimately ineffectual Kyoto Protocol for the intense hurricane activity without noting that destructive hurricanes have been devastating the Gulf Coast for as long as we've cared to keep record of them. Then you have rapper/cultural anthropology expert Kayne West explaining to the world that George Bush doesn't care about blacks and has given the National Guard permission to "go down there and shoot us!" Historian Jesse Jackson compared the scene outside the Superdome to the "hull of a slave ship." And what did the good Reverend Al Sharpton have to say? I'll let you look it up yourself. One has come to expect these limelight worshipers and their ilk to say whatever they think will retain the most shock value. Obviously the truth is secondary if it's considered at all, and statements such as the ones noted above are utterly devoid of perspective. To nobody's surprise the main stream media was breathlessly chasing every unsubstantiated rumor, running it through the mill and churning out "credible" reports. What was reportedly going on at the Superdome almost defies belief, as rumors took on a hyperbolic life of their own.

The New Orleans Times-Picayune on Monday described inflated body counts,
unverified "rapes," and unconfirmed sniper attacks as among examples of "scores
of myths about the dome and Convention Center treated as fact by evacuees, the
media and even some of New Orleans' top officials."

Mayor C. Ray Nagin told a national television audience on "Oprah" three
weeks ago of people "in that frickin' Superdome for five days watching dead
bodies, watching hooligans killing people, raping people."

The wild rumors filled the vacuum and seemed to gain credence with each
retelling — that an infant's body had been found in a trash can, that sharks
from Lake Pontchartrain were swimming through the business district, that
hundreds of bodies had been stacked in the Superdome basement.

Follow-up reporting has discredited reports of a 7-year-old being raped and
murdered at the Superdome, roving bands of armed gang members attacking the
helpless, and dozens of bodies being shoved into a freezer at the Convention
Center.

Fox News, a day before the major evacuation of the Superdome began, issued
an "alert" as talk show host Alan Colmes reiterated reports of "robberies,
rapes, carjackings, riots and murder. Violent gangs are roaming the streets at
night, hidden by the cover of darkness."

The Los Angeles Times adopted a breathless tone the next day in its
lead news story, reporting that National Guard troops "took positions on
rooftops, scanning for snipers and armed mobs as seething crowds of refugees
milled below, desperate to flee. Gunfire crackled in the distance."

The tabloid Ottawa Sun reported unverified accounts of "a man seeking help
gunned down by a National Guard soldier" and "a young man run down and then shot
by a New Orleans police officer."

London's Evening Standard invoked the future-world fantasy film "Mad Max"
to describe the scene and threw in a "Lord of the Flies" allusion for good
measure.

Nagin and Police Chief Eddie Compass appeared on "Oprah" a
few days after trouble at the Superdome had peaked.Compass told of "the little
babies getting raped" at the Superdome. And Nagin made his claim about hooligans
raping and killing.


Louisiana National Guard Col. Thomas Beron, who headed security at the
Superdome, said that for every complaint, "49 other people said, 'Thank you, God
bless you.' "The media inaccuracies had consequences in the disaster zone.

What happened to simple fact checking? What happened to asking Who, What, Where, When and Why and proceeding to write a story based on verifiable facts? Stay tuned for the forthcoming apology from the media--surely they'll want to clear a few things up to save their tarnished image.

Unhinged and Ununified

Clearly democrats and republicans disagree on a number of issues. Now it's obvious the dems cannot agree even within their own party. Hillary Clinton recently called for an ideological cease-fire among the different feuding factions within the democratic party.

Link

Clinton Angers Left With Call for Unity
Senator Accused of Siding
With Centrists
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's call for an ideological
cease-fire in the Democratic Party drew an angry reaction yesterday from liberal
bloggers and others on the left, who accused her of siding with the centrist
Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) in a long-running dispute over the future of
the party.
Long a revered figure by many in the party's liberal wing,
Clinton (D-N.Y.) unexpectedly found herself under attack after calling Monday
for a cease-fire among the party's quarreling factions and for agreeing to
assume the leadership of a DLC-sponsored initiative aimed at developing a more
positive policy agenda for the party.

What kind of party gets angry when a call for unity goes out? What kind of party thinks it's unwise to side with centrists in a bid to find common ground? What kind of party would rather divide than unite?

A party that is doomed to occupy the dust bin of history, that's what kind of party.